1. Right hand is devoid of fingernails.
2. Length of gun as compared to Oswald length is off by at least 8 inches.
3. Attempts to stand in the position Oswald is in have never been successful.
4. Both publications Oswald holds have margins off by as much as 1 1/4 inches.
5. The gun in the photo is not the same as the one in the archive.
6. The sun, as reflected in his shoes is at the 9:00AM position, yet photo is claimed to have been taken early afternoon.
7. Photo has no discernible cleft, yet Oswald had pronounced cleft.

…and it goes on and on. So, despite what those in the “scientific expert class” say, these and other problems with the photo seem to persist.

I should add that, other photos have emerged over the years, one was found to be identical to the LIFE cover photo yet did not contain any subject. And you should look more carefully at the series of photos you present. If you play with the photos, you’ll find that they contain the same background. Not nearly the same, but the same. As in, taken from a tripod and photo manipulated to frame the subject (which didn’t happen I would argue). Or, the same photo was used to produce the composites that resulted in the series.

Consider that the digital tools we use today have warped our ideas of what photo manipulation use to involve. You know, some people with “special abilities” can merely glance at a photo and point out how they don’t make sense. And brother, they glanced at this one and spent over an hour pointing out how it was done.

I do admit, however that this is a nice job for a bureaucrat.